Bouncing Dip Net Checks a Concern for Kenai

Posted: August 28, 2013 at 6:01 pm

While the trash left on Kenai beaches this year has been much better than in the past, Kenai Finance Director Terry Eubank says there’s something else that stinks at the dip net fishery…


Eubank: “We did have a number of cases where people would issue checks to us, and then when we would deposit them, they would be returned to us, not as non-sufficient funds, but as stopped payment, meaning the owner of that account initiated a stop payment on the check through their bank. These people are intentionally stopping payment on our fees.”


Eubank said they haven’t tallied the exact figures, but the volume of stopped checks this year was higher than in the past, and there will be changes.


Eubank: “This year we have started accepting credit card payments for those fees, and with cash and credit card payments being accepted for those fees, it looks like in the future we’re going to recommend to the City Council to no longer accept checks for dip net fees.”


City Council members were initially shocked to hear of the ongoing problem.

** Comments on this story do not represent the thoughts and / or opinions of KSRM Radio Group, Staff, Management or Sponsors. **

4 Comments to “Bouncing Dip Net Checks a Concern for Kenai”

  • Jeff says:

    Do not recommend to no longer accept checks make it mandatory to pay with credit cards or cash only! Also create a data base of all who stopped payment on their checks and do not let (ban) them on to the beach unless they make restitution on that stopped payment! What a bunch of scammer low lifes! This kind of crap will only lead to more restrictions and only hurts the honest ones.

  • Jeff says:

    It would be nice to know what percentage of these stop payment checks are local and how many are from other areas of the state? My guess would be more are from outside the local area.


    The state should pull the fishing lic. of those not will to pay to use these fishies.

  • common sense says:

    It is called fraud and it is already against the law. No need to make things more complicated with any more rules.